本篇回應
Pei-Chi Lo 認為 含有錯誤訊息
引用自 Pei-Chi Lo 查核回應
■影片中許多論文解讀有誤,如:

①4分9秒提的柳葉刀論文,僅提及研究中第一個出現症狀的病人無武漢海鮮市場接觸史,但這不表示病毒就是人造的。

(至多可推論源頭可能不是市場,也可能有人先在市場外感染後把病毒帶入市場。)

②10分8秒提的Nature論文,並未認為病毒是人造的、亦未提及武漢病毒實驗室,反而是提及「從動物而來的病毒在人類身上造成嚴重疾病」。

③21分28秒提的兩篇石正麗團隊論文,的確提及對於某些蝙蝠冠狀病毒或許可不透過中間宿主,直接感染人類;也的確人為合成具人類感染力的類SARS病毒,但其研究指出這是提醒蝙蝠冠狀病毒可能會再次出現的風險。無法推論本次疫情的病毒即為此團隊製造。

④25分32秒提的印度學者文章,僅是未經同儕審查的預印本,且因其技術與結果詮釋的爭議,作者已自行撤回論文。

■針對「病毒人造說」,包括Lancet、Nature Medicine等期刊的通訊評論皆依據基因分析,譴責並否認了病毒為人造。

■至於「中國政府抑制疫情訊息」應確實存在,中國科學.生命科學、The Diplomat等皆有相關評析。

資料佐證

【遭錯誤詮釋的論文原文】

4分9秒提的柳葉刀論文:
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)30183-5/fulltext

10分8秒提的Nature論文:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2008-3

21分28秒提的兩篇石正麗團隊論文:
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature12711
https://www.nature.com/articles/nm.3985

25分32秒提的印度學者文章:
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.30.927871v2

【否認病毒說的資料】

2020年2月19日Lancet通訊評論:
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)30418-9/fulltext

2020年3月17日Nature Medicine通訊評論:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9

【中國政府壓制訊息的評論】

2020年3月26日The Diplomat報導-Can China’s COVID-19 Statistics Be Trusted?
https://thediplomat.com/2020/03/can-chinas-covid-19-statistics-be-trusted/

2020年2月「中國科學.生命科學」刊出的文章-An interim review of lessons from the Novel Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) outbreak in China:
http://engine.scichina.com/publisher/scp/journal/SSV/doi/10.1360/SSV-2020-0044?slug=fulltext

A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China

AbstractEmerging infectious diseases, such as severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Zika virus disease, present a major threat to public health1,2,3. Despite intense research efforts, how, when

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2008-3

Isolation and characterization of a bat SARS-like coronavirus that uses the ACE2 receptor

AbstractThe 2002–3 pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) was one of the most significant public health events in recent history1. An ongoing outbreak of Middle Ea

https://www.nature.com/articles/nature12711

A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence

AbstractThe emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS)-CoV underscores the threat of cross-species transmission events leading to

https://www.nature.com/articles/nm.3985

Uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike protein to HIV-1 gp120 and Gag

Withdrawn , Ashutosh Kumar Pandey, Akhilesh Mishra, Parul Gupta, Praveen Kumar Tripathi, Manoj Balakrishna Menon, James Gomes, Perumal Vivekanandan, Bishwajit Kundu

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.30.927871v2

The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2

To the Editor — Since the first reports of novel pneumonia (COVID-19) in Wuhan, Hubei province, China1,2, there has been considerable discussion on the origin of the causative virus, SARS-CoV-23 (also

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9

以上內容「Cofacts 真的假的」訊息回報機器人與查證協作社群提供,以 CC授權 姓名標示-相同方式分享 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0) 釋出,於後續重製或散布時,原社群顯名及每一則查證的出處連結皆必須被完整引用。