論文門破案! 英國判決出爐! 彭文正:LSE沒蔡英文口試紀錄|政經關不了(完整版)|2021.11.28
Caven Hands 口試委員 HM Courts & Tribunals Service Mr. Michael Richardson
HM Courts & Tribunals Service is responsible for the administration of criminal, civil and family courts and tribunals in England and Wales. We are also responsible for non-devolved tribunals in Scotland and Northern Ireland. work with an independent judiciary to provide a fair, efficient and effective justice system.
Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) 26. November 2021
Decision Notice
1. The complainant has requested the names of examiners who examined the then- MissTsai In-wen ( Now President of Taiean) for her PHD and yhe report from her viva. 2. The council of the London School of Economics and political science ( The LSE) denied holding the requested information . The commisioner's decision is that , on the balance of probabiliies, the LSE does not hold the requested information . 3. The comissioner does nor require firther steps.

論文門破案! 英國判決出爐! 彭文正:LSE沒蔡英文口試紀錄|政經關不了(完整版)|2021.11.28

#政經關不了 #關不了正晶 #政論節目 #彭文正 #李晶玉今日主題:-獨家!正式法律文件:LSE向法院坦承無蔡資料-報告總統大事不妙! LSE跳船否認有viva紀錄-"惟有求證LSE是唯一且正確管道"府慘被打臉-LSE278頁資料假的? 論文國家隊偽造被抓包!-時機到了! 英國倫敦國際記者會倒數計時➤抖內《政經關...
近 31 日
14 次瀏覽




陰謀論,利用半真半假,無法完全呈現資訊下散佈混淆訊息,意圖誤導視聽(Conspiracy theory:

老人 國民黨 韓粉

本訊息有 1 則查核回應
HankOu 認為 含有個人意見
引用自 HankOu 查核回應
1.這份報告是來自ICO(Information Commissioner’s Office)的英國資訊單位報告書,不是英國法院的判決書,不適合用"判決出爐"來混淆。
2.報告內文提到"denied holding the requested information"否認的部分是指"the names of examiners"(口試委員名單),所以ICO綜合所有的可能評估推測LSE可能已經沒有留存這份委員名單。
3.學位的真實性已經由英國初級審裁處知情權分庭於2021年9月13日判決說明由倫敦大學公開的資訊足以證實。判決原文:"56. Further, we find that there is sufficient evidence already in the public domain to satisfy Mr. Richardson’s or the public’s concerns about whether or not President
Tsai was awarded a PhD, without the need to release this particular information. This includes the fact that the University has publicly confirmed that the degree was correctly awarded and that it holds records of the viva and the pass list in relation to President Tsai and the fact that the thesis appeared in the IALS list of legal theses successfully completed for postgraduate degrees published in 1985. In our view it is not reasonably necessary to also disclose the names of the examiners and the date that they signed approval of the thesis. "


英國初級審裁處知情權分庭決議文 200921 Richardson EA 2020 0212 p.pdf

以上內容「Cofacts 真的假的」訊息回報機器人與查證協作社群提供,以 CC授權 姓名標示-相同方式分享 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0) 釋出,於後續重製或散布時,原社群顯名及每一則查證的出處連結皆必須被完整引用。

加 LINE 查謠言
加 LINE 查謠言
LINE 機器人